*sigh.*

Oct. 12th, 2004 04:34 pm
kuangning: (disaffected)
[personal profile] kuangning
Sometimes, I want to make a list of oft-mangled words that make me cringe and not want to read communities.

The herb that makes the tea to start menstruation (incidentally, that makes it an emmenagogue) is parsley. Not, as some would have us believe, "parsely". No, dear, spelling it the same wrong way consistently still doesn't make you right.

Also, unless you are oviparous, and if you are, then you should be rich, that being something humans aren't designed to be, you are not laying in your bed in night. You are lying there. I know, I occasionally make the same mistake, and have to refer back to the rule to correct myself. But... try, won't you? Please?

No, I'm not going to strip with you. But if you're asking my indulgence, then certainly I can bear with you. Not "bare". That's just rude when we've never met before, don't you think?

While we're at it, I wish I could make the misspelling "dissapear", well, disappear.

Yep. Sometimes I want to make a list. And make it easy to find. Definitely post it somewhere online. And then I remember -- there already are lists. They're called "dictionaries". And, well, we know these people already aren't consulting them.

But oh, how I wish they would.

Sing it, sister!

Date: 2004-10-12 01:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cjsmith.livejournal.com
"Saftey" is like fingernails on a blackboard to me.

Also, "birth" is a NOUN. "To bear" a child is the verb... no matter how politically correct and newly popular the word "birthing" may be.

Re: Sing it, sister!

Date: 2004-10-12 01:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] midnightfae.livejournal.com
*gasp* Because, of course, languages never actually evolve! *shakes her head vigorously* Nope! Never!

Re: Sing it, sister!

Date: 2004-10-12 01:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cjsmith.livejournal.com
Ah yes, the usual response to people who prefer linguistic correctness. The moment I can tell the difference between a language evolving and stupidity, I'll be sure to rant only against one of them.

Re: Sing it, sister!

Date: 2004-10-12 01:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zibblsnrt.livejournal.com
Simple. Does a large chunk of, or a majority of, the population use the new usage? If so, it's the 'correct' one. Language is one of those things in which popular usage overrides textbook standards.

Re: Sing it, sister!

Date: 2004-10-12 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zibblsnrt.livejournal.com
It's the only measure for a living language, not most other things. I'm referring more to spoken than spelled English, though.

Re: Sing it, sister!

Date: 2004-10-12 02:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cjsmith.livejournal.com
I agree in theory. I think deciding about a specific case is not at all guaranteed to be easy. I haven't polled a statistically significant sample of Americans, much less people from other English-speaking places, about "birth"; I admit it's laziness on my part to assume Occam's razor.

Re: Sing it, sister!

Date: 2004-10-12 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com
dictionary.reference.com says:
Regional Note: Until recently the use of birth as a verb meaning "to bear (a child)" has been confined to Southern speech: "Heap o' good it do a woman to birth a mess o' young uns and raise 'em and then have 'em all go off to oncet." (Marjorie K. Rawlings). Recently, however, the nonstandard Southern usage has coincided with widespread usage of verbs derived from nouns, such as parent, network, and microwave. Birth in this new usage is most commonly found in its present participial form and is used as an adjective in compounds such as birthing center.


It's not incorrect, I'd say, so much as very regional, non-standard, and expanding. They verbed it. ;)

I'll accept non-standard as correct, but I'd be careful about usage and context.

Date: 2004-10-12 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com
The lay/lie confusion is one of my peeves. One of the teachers at the school where I taught last year confused them frequently, or rather, always said "lay." I think people assume "lie" means to tell a falsehood, and thus, is wrong.

Lay requires an object. I see it as easy, but then, I see English as a delightful adventure.

Date: 2004-10-12 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] serendipity.livejournal.com
I think I love you.

Date: 2004-10-12 03:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lothie.livejournal.com
I probably misspell parsley. *embarrassed*

Date: 2004-10-13 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lothie.livejournal.com
I doubt I'd get aggressive about it but I really did think it was spelled that way. I'm glad I know better now (and I'm such a good speller normally!).

HAHAH!

Date: 2004-10-12 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rare.livejournal.com
You're a word/grammar snob too! I blame my grandmother, since she always corrected me, but now I expect people to pay attention. And these are definitely good. Oh, the danger of homonyms! And the evils of internet chat rooms! "Thx, u gave me teh rite word 2 use!" *argh*

Date: 2004-10-12 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anoisblue.livejournal.com
I'm guilty of laying vs. lying, I think. That one always gets me. If you see it wrong in a post of mine, please tell me.

Can we add the millions who write loose when they mean lose? Drives me nuts.

Date: 2004-10-13 12:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] scarlett13.livejournal.com
I get the feeling that I am not the only one receiving e-mail and wanting to correct spelling and grammar and send it back.

September 2015

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
2021 2223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 08:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios