(no subject)
Jun. 6th, 2004 10:42 amIf you are not mourning Reagan's death, for whatever reasons... I understand. I didn't like his politics, and I thought his ethics left a lot to be desired, too. If you don't want to watch the news, I don't blame you. If you're tired of the eulogies, I hear you.
But.
If you are spending your time going out of your way (and your own journal) to be telling people who are mourning this death all the reasons they shouldn't feel what they are, quite obviously, feeling, then you, sir, or you, madam, are an ass, and I sincerely wish you didn't share my politics. Reagan's death means exactly as much as any other. The extra trappings are a bonus for him, sure, but saying he did not deserve to be honoured or mourned is distasteful, disrespectful, and abhorrent. In an ideal world, everyone who passes away would be loved and remembered. You're right, it's not right that some get so much less, when they deserve it just as much. But isn't it funny how the only time anyone ever says that is when they feel someone has got too much and they wish some would be taken away?
Try doing something that actually adds to someone else's lot, if you feel you absolutely can't bear to see Reagan honoured. Spend the time focussing on doing something that makes a good story and a warm feeling later. Ignore the fuss entirely -- and give the people who are feeling some pain the chance to feel what they feel without having to fight for the time and space to mourn. There'll be a right time to attempt to change their minds about the man. This is not that time. Have a little respect.
But.
If you are spending your time going out of your way (and your own journal) to be telling people who are mourning this death all the reasons they shouldn't feel what they are, quite obviously, feeling, then you, sir, or you, madam, are an ass, and I sincerely wish you didn't share my politics. Reagan's death means exactly as much as any other. The extra trappings are a bonus for him, sure, but saying he did not deserve to be honoured or mourned is distasteful, disrespectful, and abhorrent. In an ideal world, everyone who passes away would be loved and remembered. You're right, it's not right that some get so much less, when they deserve it just as much. But isn't it funny how the only time anyone ever says that is when they feel someone has got too much and they wish some would be taken away?
Try doing something that actually adds to someone else's lot, if you feel you absolutely can't bear to see Reagan honoured. Spend the time focussing on doing something that makes a good story and a warm feeling later. Ignore the fuss entirely -- and give the people who are feeling some pain the chance to feel what they feel without having to fight for the time and space to mourn. There'll be a right time to attempt to change their minds about the man. This is not that time. Have a little respect.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-06 09:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-06 11:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-06 11:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-06 11:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-06 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-06 01:05 pm (UTC)I have no intention of getting in the face of Reagan mourners with my opinions; however, I feel no hesitation about being frank with my opinions in my own space; and I politely disagree with some folks about the idea of leaving the field of comment on Reagan's death to the mourners, for whom I have some sympathy, and the propagandists and hagiographers, for whom I have contempt.
As Atrios said: The occasion of a man's death is not the time to pile on him, but nor is it the time to let the mythmakers get away with manufacturing reality.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-06 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-07 03:45 am (UTC)