no kidding.

[kuangning]

57.39645% - Extreme Geek

Take the Geek Test.

Comments

[dormouse-in-tea.livejournal.com]

Dangit, my 55.2whatever% just looks puny next to my friends. :P

This quiz impressed me, because they included Food Geeks!

I mean, I don't really count as a Food Geek. But I know many of them. And they are Geeky. ^_^

[kuangning]

*grins.* It was fun. I could have scored a bit higher (eek!) had there not been instance-of-occurrence restrictions on some things. And, hey, you want to be closer to normal than I am anyway. Remember that. ;)

[dormouse-in-tea.livejournal.com]

*looks doubtful* What an interesting position. Would you care to defend it from the text?

:P

I think there should be a box to check for people like me who will be grumpy because their score is too low! ^_^ And yeah, the instance-of-occurence restrictions nailed me a few times, too. Bother. :P

Woot.

[untoward.livejournal.com]

67.45562% - Geek God

If only there'd been more language questions. How is knowing Latin geekier than knowing Ancient Greek?

Geez.

Re: Woot.

[kuangning]

Ooh... that's the highest score I've seen yet among my friends. :)

[http://users.livejournal.com/killjoy_/]

62.13018% - Extreme Geek

[andr00.livejournal.com]

100% - Liar!

I have the highest score. I attained this because of a technology I invented called "lying". Lying can improve apparent performance of nearly anything. If you would like to license "lying", please contact my agent. Thank you.

[primis.livejournal.com]

"45.56213% - Super Geek"

And it'd be far far worse if I ever did much of anything RPGing...

-- Primis.

[kuangning]

*laughs.* Good for you.

[kuangning]

... I'm telling you like I told Dougie.

You are *not allowed* to score as less geeky than I am on that thing.

You're just not.

Re: Woot.

[untoward.livejournal.com]

It's kind of loaded toward the computer programmer/game geek.

Re: Woot.

[kuangning]

Yes, it is. And females. Being female counts heavily, apparently. ;)