(no subject)
Aug. 23rd, 2002 10:29 pmMrf.
You folks know I love you dearly, right? And if I didn't like you, respect your intelligence, and find you interesting, I wouldn't be reading your journals on a daily basis. Right? Right.
That said... I'm gonna be a little bit grumpy about the waste of a pretty neat idea in the trading cards. First... isn't the point supposed to be that they're all different? Unique? This had *such* potential... I was looking forward to seeing dozens of completely different designs and ideas and layouts. Right now, what I'm seeing is the same autogenerated table over and over again, not even much deviation from the green (default?) colour scheme. I already know what your userpics look like. The text is, I grant you, what I'd hoped for. But the other thing is, you can't really trade a table. I've done it with a couple of you... view source and hunt through till I find the code... but really. *sigh.* I'm being pettish, and I will get over it, but I really am disappointed.
You folks know I love you dearly, right? And if I didn't like you, respect your intelligence, and find you interesting, I wouldn't be reading your journals on a daily basis. Right? Right.
That said... I'm gonna be a little bit grumpy about the waste of a pretty neat idea in the trading cards. First... isn't the point supposed to be that they're all different? Unique? This had *such* potential... I was looking forward to seeing dozens of completely different designs and ideas and layouts. Right now, what I'm seeing is the same autogenerated table over and over again, not even much deviation from the green (default?) colour scheme. I already know what your userpics look like. The text is, I grant you, what I'd hoped for. But the other thing is, you can't really trade a table. I've done it with a couple of you... view source and hunt through till I find the code... but really. *sigh.* I'm being pettish, and I will get over it, but I really am disappointed.